Cases 21 - 30 of 985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WELLS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, DSG, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBIN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARK ROBIN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN and RENA BITTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ZIMMERMAN v. ZUCKERBERG et al
as 1:2023cv02139
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
MARK ZUCKERBERG, META PLATFORMS, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HOWARTH v. MCFADDEN PARTNERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HOWARTH
Defendant:
MCFADDEN PARTNERS, MARK MCFADDEN, HUNTER MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
WOODHOUSE v. META PLATFORMS INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS INC., ALPHABET INC., NIKE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
