Cases 21 - 29 of 29
LA Printex Industries Inc v. Peer Tee Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10027
Defendant:
Buckle Inc, Does, Joyce Leslie Inc and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries Inc
L A Printex Industries Inc v. Jump Apparel Co et al
as 2:2011cv07704
Defendant:
Ascena Retail Group Inc, Dillards Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
Edmund Kim Production Group Inc v. Maurices Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv07650
Defendant:
CAFA Seoul Tex Print Inc, Does, LAT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Kim Production Group Inc
Suddreth v. Maurices Incorporated
as 5:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Daphne D. Suddreth
Defendant:
Maurices Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Turn On Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv05957
Defendant:
Does, Maurices Incorporated, The Cato Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Maurices Incorporated
Cross Defendant:
Turn On Products, Inc.
One Step Up, Ltd. v. Maurices Incorporated
as 1:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
One Step Up, Ltd.
Defendant:
Maurices Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05868
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc. and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC, Marshalls of MA, Inc., Marshalls of CA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Samsung America, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung America, Inc., Byer California, Alyn Paige Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Almond International, Inc. v. Maurices Incorporated
as 1:2007cv01192
Defendant:
Maurices Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Almond International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
