Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Hill v. May et al
as 3:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bernard Hill
Defendant:
Bobby May, Douglas Triplett and City of Macon, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mays
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
May v. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Company et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Company and XYZ Corporations 1-10
Plaintiff:
James May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Funches et al
as 3:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Joseph Russell May, Roy L. Funches, Unknown Heirs of Bertha Funches and others
Plaintiff:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May et al v. Encompass Health Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Encompass Health Corp., Camellia Home Health of the Gulf Coast, LLC, West Mississippi Home Health Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jean James and James May
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
May v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00167
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Phillip Darryl May
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lavu, Inc v. May et al
as 3:2020cv00233
Plaintiff:
Lavu, Inc
Defendant:
Natasha May, May Day Movers, LLC, Damion May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
