Cases 21 - 30 of 1,952
Yang v. City of Brooklyn Park et al
as 0:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Chia Doua Yang
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Park , Jeffrey Tomaszewski , Chris Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Ishrak et al
as 0:2014cv04142
Defendant:
Omar Ishrak, Gary L. Ellis, Christopher J. O'Connell and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hockstein v. Collins, Jr. et al
as 0:2014cv04020
Plaintiff:
Richard Hockstein
Defendant:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr., William A. Hawkins, Omar Ishrak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Ishrak et al
as 0:2014cv03540
Plaintiff:
William A. Houston
Defendant:
Omar Ishrak , Gary L. Ellis , Christopher J. O'Connell and others
Miscellaneou:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morton v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2014cv03263
Plaintiff:
Carl Morton
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Ashby v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 0:2014cv03211
Plaintiff:
Michael Ashby
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. , Medtronic Vertelink Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Inre Medtronic, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 0:2013cv01739
Plaintiff:
Phil Pace , Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., , William A. Hawkins , Gary L. Ellis and others
West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv01686
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , William A. Hawkins , Gary L. Ellis and others
Waldoch v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01646
Plaintiff:
Rodney Waldoch
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
