Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Lindsey, Leighton v. Clark, T. et al
as 3:2012cv00923
Plaintiff:
Leighton D. Lindsey
Defendant:
T. Clark , David Gardner, Mr. or Mrs. Hable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schrage v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01271
Plaintiff:
Melanie Schrage
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seilheimer v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Melanie Seilheimer
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc
Defendant:
Craig Caldwell , Melanie Caldwell and Kerry Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00887
Plaintiff:
Melanie Washington
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arndt v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00546
Plaintiff:
Melanie Arndt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Komo Machine, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company , Stephen Fuehringer and Melani Fuehringer
Defendant:
Komo Machine, Inc. , ABC Insurance Company, DEF Distributor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pink, Melanie v. United Health Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Melanie Pink
Defendant:
United Health Group, Inc. and United Health Group, Inc. Short-Term and Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Williams v. McCulloch et al
as 3:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jesse D Williams
Defendant:
Deb McCulloch, Steve Watters, Patricia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. McCulloch et al
as 2:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jesse D Williams
Defendant:
Deb McCulloch, Steve Watters, Patricia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
