Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Henriquez v. Mendez et al
as 1:2021cv06081
Plaintiff:
Alexis Henriquez
Defendant:
John Mendez, Terrance Hunter and County Of Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. RG Professional Carpenter, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv50419
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Garcia
Defendant:
RG Professional Carpenter, Inc. and Rolando Garcia Mendez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mendez v. Cook County Health and Hospital Services et al
as 1:2021cv05086
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dalton Mendez
Defendant:
Cook County Health and Hospital Services and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubbs v. City Of Chicago, et al
as 1:2021cv04715
Plaintiff:
Cordero Stubbs
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Ricardo Mendez (Star # 18779) and Regan Allen (Star # 15090)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. P.O. McDermott #6435 et al
as 1:2021cv04627
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rivera
Defendant:
P.O. McDermott #6435, P.O. Strazzante #8496, P.O. Nelli #711 and others
Intervenor:
The Law Office of C.N. Norris, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv07499
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", HeNanPaiXuJianZhuGongChengYouXianGongSi, LHLHL and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Amplification PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Calderon-Mendez v. Metro Auto On Ogden, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06733
Defendant:
Phong K. Thai and Metro Auto On Ogden, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fidel Calderon-Mendez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
