Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Mendez v. Meek et al
as 0:2018cv02332
Defendant:
Lt. Sladek, Bryan Meek, Ms. Whiplinger and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Acting Warden and SIS Communication Monitoring System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Stanton et al
as 0:2016cv04002
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Dr. Stanton, L. LaRiva and All Other Unknow and Known
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Dole et al
as 0:2016cv02644
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
T. Dole , Sladek , J. Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Minnesota et al
as 0:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
FMC Minnesota , Lt. Holbus , Officer Kepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez Castro et al v. Midwest Rides and Concessions, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Mendez Castro, Maria del Carmen Mendez Castro, Ramiro Gonzalez Juarez and others
Defendant:
Midwest Rides and Concessions, Inc, Midwest Rides and Concessions Inc., Mad-Jax Amusements Inc. doing business as Midwest Rides and Concessions Inc. and others
Mendez v. Stanton et al
as 0:2015cv03732
Petitioner:
Raphael Mendez
Respondent:
S. Stanton, B. Glavin-ovich and Any Other Unknown Supportor's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Federal Medical Center et al
as 0:2014cv04792
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center, Warden, Counselors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Unknown Correctional Officer et al
as 0:2014cv04528
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Mr. Gilk, Calvin Wedington, Other Unknown at FMC Rochester, Minn. et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez v. Rosemark et al.
as 0:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Rosemark, Ms. Cosette and and Other UNKNOWN members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
