Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Alexander v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00965
Plaintiff: Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Defendant: Wright, Scott Ruszowski, Bill Redman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Joseph S. Marazita et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff: West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: JOSEPH S. MARAZITA, MICHAEL D. MARAZITA and MAGNUM SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Hickingbottom v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00758
Petitioner: Michael D Hickingbottom and Michael Dewayne Hickingbottom
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hickingbottom v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00553
Petitioner: Michael D Hickingbottom
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hickingbottom v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00235
Petitioner: Michael D Hickingbottom
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PASSMORE v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00295
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. PASSMORE
Defendant: D. ZATECKY and K. HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAGLE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06439
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKINGBOTTOM v. REECE
as 2:2021cv00210
Respondent: D. REECE
Petitioner: MICHAEL D. HICKINGBOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADDY v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00609
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. ADDY
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BROADFIELD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2021cv00032
Plaintiff: BRIAN DWAYNE BROADFIELD
Defendant: KLEPZ, HAROLD SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?