Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Herrera v. Use of Force City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01699
Defendant:
Correction Officer Chang, Correction Officer Drapen, Captain Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01865
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant:
The City Municipality of New York, Commissioner Of New York City Corrections Horn, John Antoneli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Hourihane
as 1:2009cv10309
Petitioner:
Carl D. Wells
Respondent:
Michael Hourihane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crichlow v. Horn et al
as 1:2009cv09596
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
Martin Horn, Michael Hourihane, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. The City Municipality of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09460
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant:
The City Municipality of New York, Horn, John Antoneli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guerra v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08360
Plaintiff:
David Guerra
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv07162
Plaintiff:
Edlewis Cooper
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Phillip et al
as 1:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Phillip, Santiago, Streetman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MIller-Hyman v. Hourihane et al
as 1:2008cv06101
Petitioner:
Jerrell MIller-Hyman
Respondent:
Michael Hourihane
Defendant:
City of NY Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MIller-Hyman v. Hourihane et al
as 1:2008cv06102
Petitioner:
Jerrell MIller-Hyman
Respondent:
Michael Hourihane
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
