Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Roberts v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02920
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Roberts, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Kagenski et al
as 1:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
James Marquail Lewis
Defendant:
Michael T. Kagenski, The City of Lake City, Georgia and David Colwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulding Detention Center Inmates et al v. Paulding Detention Center
as 4:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Paulding Detention Center Inmates and Michael T Napier
Defendant:
Paulding Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Harbour Portfolio VII, LP et al
as 1:2017cv00954
Defendant:
Harbour Portfolio VII, LP, CWAM II, LLC, Harbour Portfolio VI, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Horne, Demarkus R. Horne, Jackie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Toto et al v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Toto and Lori W. Toto
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC and Christiana Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
MCCOY v. USA
as 5:2016cv00236
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL T MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Toto et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv04514
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Toto and Lori W. Toto
Defendant:
Christiana Trust , Homeloanadvisors.com and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Genworth Life Insurance Company v. Chung et al
as 1:2014cv03835
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hannah M. Chung and Michael T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Brokas et al v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02369
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Brokas and Nora Brokas
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
