Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Gill v. Foley et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael T Gill
Defendant:
B Foley, B Leeah, K Dabey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
General Employment Enterprises, Inc. v. Willis Group, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03133
Plaintiff:
General Employment Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Willis Group, LLC, Willis Group Holdings, LLC, JABCO Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00619
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. League Medical Concepts et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Richardson
Defendant:
League Medical Concepts, FNU Polaurapu, FNU Bryd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cooper v. Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Cooper
Defendant:
Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc. aka "MERS"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wise et al v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Gerald Arthur Anderson, Ronnie Mack Armstrong, Jr., Micah Cannady and others
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc. and EnerSafe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Rocheleau v. McNicholas
as 4:2015cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam B. Rocheleau
Defendant:
Michael T. McNicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Mayes et al
as 4:2015cv02792
Plaintiff:
Brian Byrd
Defendant:
Michael T Mayes and Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv02457
Petitioner:
Michael T Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
