Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Williams v. Dart
as 1:2016cv09384
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
Corey A Brooks
Defendant:
Michael Williams, Shawnee Correctional Center and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwyer et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00697
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwyer , Dan Tibbs , Brathel McNeil and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Allen et al
as 3:2016cv50213
Defendant:
C.O Allen, C.O Johnson and C.O Asprooth
Plaintiff:
Michael William Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bautista et al
as 1:2016cv05797
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Miguel Bautista, William Molina, Dominik Drozdel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Summit Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv04640
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Summit Police Dept., U.S. Marshalls , D.E.A. Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv04139
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Cermek Health Service and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Michael William Simon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PNC Bank, National Association v. Fellows
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest Via Merger To National City Bank, Successor In Interest Via Merger To Mid America Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Michael William Fellows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bankston v. IDOC et al
as 3:2015cv01275
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Bankston
Defendant:
IDOC, John R Baldwin and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
