Cases 21 - 30 of 648
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Wrongful Termination of Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
C. et al v. McKnight et al
as 8:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
J. C. and G. C.
Defendant:
Monifa B. McKnight and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
P. et al v. McKnight et al
as 8:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
S. P. and A. P.
Defendant:
Monifa B. McKnight and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Bahreini v. Zsebedics et al
as 8:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bahreini
Defendant:
Paul Zsebedics, Al Sivick, Montgomery County States Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mpoy v. The State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, Marcy Waxman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
