Cases 21 - 30 of 201
Lehmann v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
Mindy Lehmann
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer and others
WAG Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 3:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
WAG Acquisition. L.L.C.
Defendant:
Netflix Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ormerod v. Barton et al
as 4:2022cv04700
Plaintiff:
Judith Ormerod
Defendant:
Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Dopfner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Whitehead v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04049
Plaintiff:
Miaya D. Whitehead and Miaya Deneen Whitehead
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Margaret C. DeLoatch, Mega-Diva Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Renzie Wilson Price v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04568
Plaintiff:
Renzie Wilson Price
Defendant:
Netflix Inc., Dennis Liu, Jason Piperberg and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. Netflix, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Theodore Sarandos and others
In re Netflix, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
Fiyyaz Pirani and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Ted Sarandos and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Petitioner:
Ty Correy
Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Netflix Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
