Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sims v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Nina Sims
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Simoneaux v. Ross et al
as 2:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Simoneaux
Defendant:
Joy Ross, Nina Enlers, Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carroll, Pamela Dalgo, Nicholas Dalgo and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Motor Works of Georgia, LLC, Coachmen Motor Works, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shelby v. Enlers et al
as 2:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Delmar Earl Shelby
Defendant:
Nina Enlers and Quinton Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chalaire et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00527
Plaintiff:
Diane Alice Chalaire, Adonis Malcom Daigle, Louis Mascaro and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston Farm Properties, L.P. et al v. Crownpoint Resources, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Johnston Farm Properties, L.P., Carey Johnston and Nina Johnston
Defendant:
Crownpoint Resources, Inc., Denbury Onshore, LLC, Denbury Operating Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lockett v. King et al
as 2:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Carl Daniel Lockett
Defendant:
Ronald King, James Johnson, Hubbard Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goudelock v. McLemore
as 3:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robert Goudelock and Robert Goudelock
Defendant:
Nina Elise McLemore and Nina Elise McLemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
