Cases 21 - 30 of 42
FLAMER v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv04012
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLAMER
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, HARRSCH and LISA NOVAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMSTOCK v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 5:2015cv05790
Petitioner:
BRANDON JAMES COMSTOCK
Respondent:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON/JAIL, EAGLEVILLE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALL v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv01847
Plaintiff:
DAWN BALL
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, EDNA MCCUTCHIN, JOHN DOE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Matthews v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 14-4597
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL
Anthony Matthews v. Norristown State Hospital, et al
as 14-4596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
George Wadis v. Norristown State Hospital, et al
as 14-4097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WADIS
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, THEODORE and ISAIAH
Anthony Matthews v. Norristown State Hospital, et al
as 14-3835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WADIS v. THE NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2013cv05812
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WADIS
Defendant:
THE NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, THEODORE and ISAIAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRESSLEY v. SCI AT DALLAS et al
as 2:2013cv04857
Plaintiff:
DALACEY PRESSLEY
Defendant:
SCI AT DALLAS, LUZERNE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressley v. SCI at Dallas et al
as 1:2013cv02021
Plaintiff:
Dalacey Pressley
Defendant:
SCI at Dallas, Luzerne County Correctional Facility and Norristown State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
