Cases 21 - 30 of 54
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. MANENTI et al
as 1:2015cv07213
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN MANENTI, JOSEPH NORWOOD, MARK A. KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ABRAMOV v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2015cv06537
Plaintiff:
GIDON ABRAMOV
Defendant:
J.T. SHARTLE, DAVID DEMPSEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TURNER v. JANE DOE et al
as 1:2015cv05942
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J.T. SHARTLE, NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TURNER v. RODGER et al
as 1:2015cv05499
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Defendant:
M. RODGER, J.T. SHARTLE, ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NORWOOD v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04979
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MIA NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORWOOD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv04149
Petitioner:
MICHAEL NORWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NORWOOD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv02996
Petitioner:
MICHAEL NORWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
