Cases 21 - 30 of 534
Anim v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Charles Anim
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC et al v. Gifford et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC and Evgjieni Baca
Defendant:
Dierdre Gifford and John F. McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angeski v. Nielsen Company (US), LLC
as 3:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Angeski
Defendant:
Nielsen Company (US), LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
L. et al v. Newell Brands Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
L. L., Justin Lapointe, Mary Lapointe and others
Defendant:
Newell Brands Inc., Target Stores, Inc., Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. doing business as GE Appliances and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith et al v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Smith and Austin Smith
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hops 44 LLC v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Hops 44 LLC
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Furst v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Joel Furst
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and US Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
