Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Nance v. Anderson et al
as 1:2015cv00101
Defendant: P.O. Alveras, Antenner Anderson, P.O. Borestein and others
Plaintiff: Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. Heley et al
as 1:2014cv06174
Defendant: Director South Beach Psych Center, J. Foley, Director Peggy Heley and others
Plaintiff: Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04708
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00394
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nance v. Heley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01173
Respondent: Peggy Heley
Petitioner: Harold M Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nance v. Padughbe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00583
Defendant: T.A. Albert, T.A. Cassius, Dr. John Doe and others
S.W: Abraham Davis
Plaintiff: Harold M Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Heley
as 1:2011cv00863
Petitioner: Harold M. Nance
Respondent: Peggy Heley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nance v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv00861
Petitioner: Harold M. Nance
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nance v. Padughbe et al
as 1:2011cv00397
Plaintiff: Harold M. Nance
Defendant: Padughbe, John Doe 063 PCT, Jane Doe 063 PCT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Fela Broadway LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05676
Defendant: Fela Broadway LLC, Fela On Broadway LLC, Roy Gabay Productions and others
Plaintiff: Marilyn Nance
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?