Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Frontis et al v. USA et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Northern Management Services, Inc. and USA
Plaintiff:
Neil Brockwehl and Constance Frontis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Wisconsin Province of the Society of Jesus v. Cassem et al
as 3:2017cv01477
Defendant:
Neil Kraner, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund, Audrey F. Cassem and others
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Province of the Society of Jesus
Not Classified By Court:
Sandra Gersten
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Adgers v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Troy-Allen Adgers, Sr.
Defendant:
Terrance M. O'Neil, State Attorney General Office, Department of Correction Warden Osborn C.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
etouches, Inc. v. Swoogo, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01989
Plaintiff:
etouches, Inc.
Defendant:
Swoogo, LLC, Swoogo Limited, Leonora Valvo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Schibi v. Semple et al
as 3:2016cv01410
Plaintiff:
Michael Schibi
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Sue O'Laughlin, Carol Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Neil E. Atlas
as 3:2016gp00019
Moulthrop v. Slavin et al
as 3:2016cv00220
Plaintiff:
Maria Moulthrop
Defendant:
Michael Slavin, David McKnight, Orlando Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Mather et al
as 3:2016mc00005
Witne:
William Greenwood
Movant:
Neil Mather and Alan Roberts
Objector:
Carlyle Investment Management LLC , TC Group, LLC , TCG Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00881
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015mc00057
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
