Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Gouin v. Boston Harbor Cruises, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10440
Plaintiff:
Kathryn S. Gouin
Defendant:
Boston Harbor Cruises, Inc. and Nolan Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolan v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv30055
Plaintiff:
James E. Nolan
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Unitt v. Helsel et al
as 1:2013cv11926
Plaintiff:
Lee P. Unitt
Defendant:
Christine Helsel, Tracy Hutton, Albert Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
McCutcheon v. Beverly, City of et al
as 1:2013cv11520
Plaintiff:
Terrin Antoin McCutcheon
Defendant:
Beverly, City of , Thomas F. Nolan, Jr. , Michael Cassola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
KeyBank, N.A. v. SBR Corp., d/b/a Cape Yachts et al
as 1:2012cv11868
Plaintiff:
KeyBank, N.A.
Defendant:
SBR Corp. and David J. Nolan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nolan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10882
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcia Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv40003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv10152
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO , STEPHEN FECHO , ANDREA ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosenberg v. Hovsepian et al
as 1:2010cv12272
Plaintiff:
Michael Rosenberg
Defendant:
Ronald Hovsepian , Richard Crandall , Richard Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
