Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Lt. O'Connor, Chaplain Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. JOHN DOE/JANE DOE (WARDEN) 2017 et al
as 2:2019cv02774
Plaintiff:
ANTON C. STEWART
Defendant:
JOHN DOE/JANE DOE (WARDEN) 2017, JOHN/JANE DOE (HEAD CHAPLAIN) 2017, JOHN/JANE DOE (HEAD OF MENTAL HEALTH) 2017 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Michael Wenesowicz, Superintendent Marsh, John E. Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DREW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2018cv01452
Plaintiff:
AL-AKH AKHBAR and ANTOINE DREW
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ, C/O THOMASINA CONKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JORDAN v. MURIN et al
as 1:2018cv00228
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER LUTZ, JANA JORDAN, CHAPLAIN KOSAREK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CRUMB v. CHAPLAIN BASKIN
as 2:2018cv00849
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN BASKIN
Plaintiff:
EARL ROBINSON CRUMB, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN et al v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS J. BROWN, DAJON J. ROWE and LARRY W. JAMIESON, JR.
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, SERGI, HEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TONSIL v. QUIGGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv06402
Plaintiff:
ERIC COURTNEY TONSIL
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGGLEY , B.C.J.S. , JOHN - DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. HARPER et al
as 2:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
DEERING CARTER
Defendant:
HARPER , REUBEL , JOHN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER et al v. HARPER et al
as 2:2013cv01252
Plaintiff:
DEERING CARTER and DAJON SMITH
Defendant:
HARPER, CHAPLAIN, DEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
