Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Hill v. Koch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00592
Plaintiff: Clinton Hill
Defendant: Ty Koch, Otis Hughes, Pam Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carnahan v. Koch et al
as 4:2012cv00594
Plaintiff: Derek Carnahan
Defendant: Ty Koch, Otis Hughes and Mark Oatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towns v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01062
Petitioner: James Otis Towns
Respondent: Terry Martin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halstied v. Crothall Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00938
Plaintiff: Jamie Halstied
Defendant: Crothall Healthcare Inc and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Auten v. Koch et al
as 4:2011cv00786
Plaintiff: David Joseph Lee Auten, Jr
Defendant: Ty Koch and Otis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatkehoodle v. Porter et al
as 4:2010cv00615
Plaintiff: Tara Chatkehoodle
Defendant: Victor Porter , Otis Gaddis , Sam Troglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00381
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lacy v. Parker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv01094
Petitioner: Otis H Lacy
Respondent: David Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00306
Plaintiff: Edwin S Moore, Jr, Edwin Stanton Moore, Sr, William Beaver Moore and others
Defendant: Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?