Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Pagan v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2017cv06466
Petitioner:
Nico Pagan
Respondent:
Christen Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Franco v. Pagan et al
as 3:2017cv06285
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Franco
Defendant:
Cynthia Pagan and Darren Badong
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bailey et al-v-UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv06227
Plaintiff:
Hua Jiang, Theng Boo, Jimmy Tang and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc., Universal Protection Service, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bailey et al-v-UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 4:2017cv06227
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bailey , Theng Boo , Dillion Buchanan and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Universal Protection Service, LP and Valacal, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv05888
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv04375
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Nadine Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08138
Plaintiff:
Donna Addy, Carolyn Allen, Carolyn Allen and others
Defendant:
Does, Greenstone LLC, McKesson Corporation and others
Popescu v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
Virgil Popescu
Defendant:
San Diego, City of, San Diego Police Department, Jerry Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Pagan et al v. Timothy Hopkins
as 8:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Brittany Espinoza and Michael Pagan
Defendant:
Timothy Hopkins
Alyshia Battiest et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03022
Plaintiff:
Alyshia Battiest, Delsa Bere, Amanda Blair and others
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
