Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Eric Bloss v. Patton State Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv05362
Plaintiff:
Eric Bloss
Defendant:
Racquel Hanson and Patton State Hospital
Lloyd Brooks Jr. v. L.A. Twin Towers Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv03406
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brooks, Jr.
Respondent:
L.A. Twin Towers Correctional Facility and Patton State Hospital
Jack Robert Smith v. Patton State Hospital
as 5:2017cv00441
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital
Petitioner:
Jack Robert Smith
Pines v. Potts et al
as 3:2015cv00879
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Defendant:
Potts, Policar and Patton State Hospital Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Mule Creek State Prison et al
as 2:2014cv02149
Plaintiff:
Brian Moffitt
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison, K Lizzaro, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Boyd et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Access Securepak, Alverez, Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd, John Brown, Robert Castro and others
Blythe, Indio, RPDC, Smith, SWBC:
Riverside County Jail System
Samer Atiyeh v. Patton State Hospital
as 2:2013cv09320
Petitioner:
Samer Atiyeh
Respondent:
Patton State Hospital
Brian Jeffrey Brown v. J.C. Penny Company Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02172
Plaintiff:
BRIAN-JEFFREY BROWN
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company Inc, Patton State Hospital, Riverside County Sheriff's Department and others
Christopher Deshawn Butler v Sheriff Department of Riverside County et al
as 5:2013cv02153
Petitioner:
Christopher Deshawn Butler
Respondent:
LAW OFFICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Monica Nguyen, Patton State Hospital and others
Christopher Deshawn Butler v Sheriff Department of Riverside County et al
as 5:2013cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deshawn Butler
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital, Public Defender Office, RIVERSIDE COUNTY COURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
