Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Bushansky v. Metaldyne Performance Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10508
Defendant:
Metaldyne Performance Group, Inc., George Thanapolous, Kevin Penn and others
Plaintiff:
Bushansky Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clemens v. Mount Clemens Community School District et al
as 2:2016cv11444
Plaintiff:
Renee Clemens
Defendant:
Mount Clemens Community School District , William A. Pearson , Mount Clemens Community Schools Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mifsud et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10049
Plaintiff:
Patrick F Mifsud and Entertainment Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2015cv14031
Plaintiff:
Beverly Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clark et al v. Royal Transportation Company et al
as 2:2015cv13243
Plaintiff:
Debra Clark , Brooksey Irvine , Reginald Morrissette and others
Defendant:
Royal Transportation Company, Donald Fitzsimmons, Debra Fitzsimmons and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pearson, et al v. Sarmiento, et al
as 2:2015cv12967
Plaintiff:
Mark Pearson and Shelley Pearson
Defendant:
Ramon Sarmiento and U-Haul Co. of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson et al v. C & J General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv12467
Defendant:
C & J General Contractors, Inc. , Sam Worthy and Kenneth Jordan
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pearson , Isiah Williams and Antwaun Anderson
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601
Raleem-X et al v. Ward et al
as 2:2015cv11905
Plaintiff:
Raleem-X, Iesha Northington, Poncietta Earle and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, B. Kamin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
