Cases 21 - 29 of 29
PANTOS v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP, BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68821
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. PANTOS, GEORGE A. PANTOS and GEORGE A. PANTOS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP, BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP, BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP, BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68813
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL and others
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LARSEN v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64467
Plaintiff:
FRANK E LARSEN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, PHILIP CAREY CORP, BRIGGS MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DANIELS et al v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv63532
Plaintiff:
JAMES DANIELS, JAMES DANIELS, ELLA DANIELS and others
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, MEXICO BRICK & FIRE CLAY COMPANY, U S GYPSUM CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HERRINGTON et al v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv63561
Plaintiff:
RALPH K HERRINGTON, RALPH K HERRINGTON, RALPH K HERRINGTON and others
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, MEXICO BRICK & FIRE CLAY COMPANY, A P GREEN FIRE & BRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILSON et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERG et al
as 2:2007cv73624
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILSON, DOUGLAS WILSON, IZELAR WILSON and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERG, CELOTEX CORP, PHILIP CAREY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EVERDYKE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68060
Plaintiff:
GORDON EVERDYKE and JOYCE EVERDYKE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ayres, et al v. US Gypsum Company, et al
as 4:2001cv00374
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Ayres , Jane Ayres , Adrian Wyatt Arterburn and others
Defendant:
US Gypsum Company, Garlock Inc, Crown Cork & Seal Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Dial v. Raybestos-Manhattan, et al
as 3:1997cv00952
Plaintiff:
Herman Dial
Defendant:
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Avondale Shipyards, Inc. , Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
