Cases 21 - 30 of 387
Wolfe v. Alger County et al
as 1:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Mary Wolfe
Defendant:
Alger County and Pamela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wolfe v. Alger, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mary Wolfe
Defendant:
Alger County, Pamela Johnson and Alger, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Feldman v. United Physicians, Inc.
as 2:2023cv11033
Plaintiff:
Pamela Feldman
Defendant:
United Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Adams, et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10972
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams, et al, Deborah Adams, Stephen Altenbuarg and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cross Defendant:
Stephen Carlson
Jenkins v. Xanadu Marketing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jenkins
Defendant:
Xanadu Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant:
Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
