Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Boyd v. Washington et al
as 2:2013cv01030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dicky Boyd
Defendant:
Jerry Washington and Richard Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pittman v. Charleston County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Devante A Pittman
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriff Department , Christopher Davis , James Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pittman v. Lovingood et al
as 2:2012cv03302
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Pittman
Defendant:
Chaplain Lovingood, Chief Arwood and Tom Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Murphy-Pittman v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03179
Plaintiff:
Teresa S Murphy-Pittman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Macari Medical Inc and William G Macari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Murphy-Pittman v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02820
Plaintiff:
Teresa S Murphy-Pittman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Macari Medical Inc and William G Macari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Battle v. King et al
as 2:2012cv02476
Plaintiff:
Korell Battle
Defendant:
Darryl King, Jan Pittman and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Pittman
as 4:2011cv02851
Plaintiff:
Andre Fletcher
Defendant:
Mr Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
Steven Laroy Pittman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Poore v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 6:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard Poore
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Patricia O Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
