Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Prato, D.D.S., P.L.L.C. v. Patterson Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05109
Plaintiff:
Arnell M. Prato, D.D.S., P.L.L.C.
Defendant:
Patterson Companies, Inc., Henry Schein, Inc. and Benco Dental Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Braun v. Sapan et al
as 3:2015cv01392
Plaintiff:
Conrad J. Braun
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Sapan , Christopher J. Reichman and Prato & Reichman, APC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Prato et al v. John Peterson et al
as 8:2014cv01834
Defendant:
DOES and John Peterson
Plaintiff:
Paul Prato and Sheila Prato
Prato et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv03406
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Prato and Scott Prato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Palumbo et al
as 1:2013mc00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Palumbo , Rosario Prato , John Aquista and others
Defendant:
Anthony Fasulo, Albert Alimena, Dominick Agostino and others
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
PRATO v. SERVICECOM USA, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv04595
Plaintiff:
ALFRED PRATO
Defendant:
SERVICECOM USA, INC. and SHANNON PRATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Prato et al v. The United States of America
as 1:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Angela T. Prato and Megan M. Prato
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Domingo Prato-Higuera, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-14883
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ALFREDY PRATO-HIGUERA, INES ASTRID RAMIREZ-MOLINA and LUIS ALFREDO PRATO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
:
SERVICE
Malone v. Tri State LLc et al
as 1:2008cv03370
Plaintiff:
Edmond Malone
Defendant:
Tri State LLc, Tri State Gate LLC , Garon Fence Co. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Browne v. San Francisco Sheriffs Department
as 4:2003cv00047
Plaintiff:
Darren Browne
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriffs Department, Madden , Huntoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
