Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 91
PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS et al
as 1:2021mc00166
In Re: PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC. doing business as ABC NEWS, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Respondent: LORI VINSON and THOMAS VINSON
MEADOWS v. PELOSI et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff: MARK MEADOWS
Defendant: NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Intervenor: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00084
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, GANNETT CO., INC., NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00087
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
IN RE: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00086
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS COALITION'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2021cv01294
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
IN RE: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021mc00046
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS IN THE CAPITOL RIOT CASES
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN RE: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
as 1:2021mc00034
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
TURNER et al v. U.S. AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02885
Defendant: MORVARED NAMDARKHAN, U.S. AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA, MICHAEL PACK and others
Plaintiff: MARIE LENNON, GRANT TURNER, SHAWN POWERS and others
Amicus Curiae: ELIOT ENGEL and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
TIKTOK INC. et al v. TRUMP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02658
Plaintiff: TIKTOK INC. and BYTEDANCE LTD.
Not Classified By Court: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and WILBUR L. ROSS, JR.
Petitioner: NETCHOICE, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and JEFFREY A. LOVITKY
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?