Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Texas Cable & Telecom Assn, et al v. Rick Perry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-51113
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIME WARNER CABLE and TEXAS CABLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL HUDSON, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES FOR UTILITY ISSUES, GTE SOUTHWEST INC, doing business as Verizon Southwest, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as SBC Texas and others
Utex Communications Corp v. Public Utilities Commission of Texas et al
as 1:2010cv00863
Defendant: Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr., Donna L. Nelson, Public Utilities Commission of Texas and others
Plaintiff: Utex Communications Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 252 Review of State Utilities Commission Determinations
Utex Communications Corp v. Public Utility Cmsn of Texas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-50313
Plaintiff - Appellant: UTEX COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, PAUL HUDSON, in his Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE CARUTHERS PARSLEY, in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Fitch v. Public Util Cmsn TX, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-50088
Plaintiff - Appellant: F CARY FITCH, doing business as Affordable Telecom
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO, doing business as AT&T Texas, PAUL HUDSON, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Tex-Link Communications, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00040
Plaintiff: Tex-Link Communications, Inc. and Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Defendant: Public Utility Commission of Texas, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Paul Hudson and others
Counter Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.
Counter Defendant: Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Commission
Logix Comm LP, et al v. Public Util Cmsn TX, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-51697
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOGIX COMMUNICATIONS LP, doing business as Logix Communications
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, PAUL HUDSON, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of The Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE PARSLEY, In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of The Public Utility Commission of Texas and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as AT&T Texas
TX Cable & Telecom v. Perry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-51514
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEXAS CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL HUDSON, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES FOR UTILITY ISSUES, GTE SOUTHWEST INC, doing business as Verizon Southwest, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as SBC Texas and others
AR Elec Engy Consum v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 94-1461
Petitioner: Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Arkansas Public Service Commission, Cities of Campbell and Thayer, Missouri, City of Benton, Arkansas and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: City of Lafayette, Louisiana and Lafayette Public Power Authority

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?