Cases 21 - 30 of 85
James v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff's Office, Sacramento County, McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nery Quintanilla v. Shawn Hatton
as 2:2017cv07874
Defendant:
Shawn Hatton
Petitioner:
Nery Quintanilla
Kevin I. Quintanilla v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv05028
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kevin I Quintanilla
Wolzen et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Janet Wolzen , Linda Godfrey , Teresa Navarro and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quintanilla Vasquez et al v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00755
Defendant:
Libre by Nexus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Quintanilla Vasquez and Gabriela Jamileth Perdomo Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quintanilla Vasquez et al v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00755
Plaintiff:
Quintanilla Vasquez, Juan Quintanilla Vasquez, Gabriela Jamileth Perdomo Ortiz and others
Defendant:
Libre by Nexus, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Donovan, Richard Moore and Evan Ajin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quintanilla v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
as 5:2016cv07085
Plaintiff:
Fidel Quintanilla
Defendant:
Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Joe Quintanilla v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2016cv01514
Defendant:
Clear Recon Corporation, Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Joe Quintanilla
Maria Quintanilla v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2016cv01400
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Does and Britton Speakman
Plaintiff:
Maria Quintanilla
Mejia-Quintanilla v. USA
as 3:2016cv03591
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
