Cases 21 - 30 of 61
United States of America v. Schmidt Lithograph Co. et al
as 2:2019mc00096
Defendant:
United States Printing & Lithograph Company of California, Wallace Martin, W. E. Steege and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant:
F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
(HC) Stephen v. Fox
as 2:2019cv00528
Respondent:
R. W. Fox
Petitioner:
Jimmie Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Deon Brazier v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv02348
Defendant:
T. Lee, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deon Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas John Heilman v. D. H. McAlister et al
as 2:2018cv06569
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
Captain D. H. McAlister, R. Ochoa, X. Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmie Stephen v. R. W. Fox
as 2:2018cv05613
Respondent:
Warden R. W. Fox
Petitioner:
Jimmie Stephen
Williams et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv09210
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington Mutual Bank, David Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
B. S. C., He Lana R.N. Williams, Yolanda Y. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen v. Fox et al
as 2:2016cv02574
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
R W Fox, D E Cueva, D Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2015cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hill
Defendant:
Gary Swarthout, R. W. Cappel and Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chanan, et al
as 2:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
Jackie M. Johnson
Defendant:
Chanan, Irvin K. Champlin, D Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
