Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Mariano v. Aljen Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Virgilio Mariano
Defendant:
Aljen Enterprises LLC and Rahim Nathoo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
United States of America v. Karediya
as 1:2016mc00015
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rahim Karediya
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Integrated Instrument Services, Inc. v. Rahim et al
as 4:2016cv01837
Plaintiff:
Integrated Instrument Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Aziz Rahim and Pippets Pro, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rahim v. Integrated Instrument Services Inc.
as 4:2016cv00734
Defendant:
Integrated Instrument Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aziz Rahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguirre et al v. R & N, Inc. d/b/a Taco Bell et al
as 4:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Edder T. Aguirre and Hugo S. Sierra
Defendant:
R & N, Inc. d/b/a Taco Bell, H.N.R.S. Enterprise, Inc. d/b/a Taco Bell and Rahim Manesiya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Karriem v. Kish LLC
as 3:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahim Karriem
Defendant:
Kish LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
ANSARI v. AKP Enterprise, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv02980
Plaintiff:
MOHIUDDIN ALI ANSARI
Defendant:
AKP Enterprise, LLC, 59 Enterprises, Inc., Garner Street Enterprise, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
ANSARI v. Khimsons Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02650
Plaintiff:
MOHIUDDIN ALI ANSARI
Defendant:
Khimsons Enterprises, Inc., Twin Logistics, LLC, B. R. Crane & Equipment, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Jiwani et al
as 3:2013cv03006
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Aziz Jiwani, Mohammed Jiwani, Nizar Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ervin et al v. Atkinson et al
as 4:2013cv00603
Plaintiff:
Catina Ann Marsh Ervin
Defendant:
David Atkinson, Rahim Aqqani, Beverly Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
