Cases 21 - 30 of 32
BERETE v. CORTAZO et al
as 5:2011cv04111
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SITA BERETE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CORTAZO and READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO NUNEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA , CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT , WILLIAM HEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2010cv03419
Plaintiff:
PEDRO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, PERKINS, CHRISTOPHER CORTAZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2010cv02688
Plaintiff:
JOSE MENDOZA
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, TIM RAUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2009cv05772
Plaintiff:
DAVID TROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RONALD MIKO and CHRIS DINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEARS v. LEPORACE et al
as 5:2009cv05749
Plaintiff:
JASON SPEARS
Defendant:
PASQUALE LEPORACE and THE READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANNAWAY v. KARETAS et al
as 5:2009cv02688
Plaintiff:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS KARETAS, MATTHEW BEIGHLEY, JOSEPH M. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZHENG v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2008cv04970
Plaintiff:
XITAO ZHENG
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, READING CODE SERVICES DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOHOSKI v. CORTAZZO et al
as 5:2008cv02864
Plaintiff:
MARTY A. MOHOSKI
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CORTAZZO and READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GONZALEZ-PEREZ v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2008cv02699
Plaintiff:
TOMAS GONZALEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, CITY OF READING, CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
