Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Morrill v. Stefani et al
as 1:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Richard Morrill
Defendant:
Gwen Stefani, Pharrell Williams, Harajuku Lovers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Byrne v. Record et al
as 1:2016cv02690
Plaintiff:
Ian Byrne
Defendant:
Kevin Record and JBS Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert (I) A. Mc Donald, Robert A. Mc Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Deemer v. Board for Correction of Naval Records
as 1:2014cv02978
Plaintiff:
Leonard H. Deemer
Defendant:
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Central Lodging LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00805
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Screen Gems-EMI Music, Inc. , Dale Morris Music and others
Defendant:
Central Lodging LLC and Bruce Rahmani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Holmes v. Witchell et al
as 1:2013cv00807
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holmes
Defendant:
James Witchell and Independent Record & Video
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Holmes v. Witchell et al
as 1:2012cv02270
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holmes
Defendant:
James Witchell and Independent Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
