Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynolds v. Roehrenbeck et al
as 3:2010cv05827
Plaintiff:
Annaleine Reynolds
Defendant:
William Roehrenbeck , Carl Brown , Obaidullah Zekria and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Richard Davis v. Terri Gonzalez
as 2:2010cv06067
Petitioner:
Richard Davis
Respondent:
Terri Gonzalez
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2010cv01049
Defendant:
Ray Mario Arroyo, Richard Davis Arroyo and Arroyos Cafe & Molino Rojo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2010at00553
Defendant:
Ray Mario Arroyo, Richard Davis Arroyo and Arroyos Cafe & Molino Rojo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2010at00552
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ray Mario Arroyo, Richard Davis Arroyo and Arroyos Cafe & Molino Rojo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Khangura v. American Mortgage Express et al
as 2:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
Balwinder S. Khangura
Defendant:
American Mortgage Express, Spencer Richardson, Ace Holding Co. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richard Davis v. John Marshall
as 2:2008cv01513
Petitioner:
Richard Davis
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Baker et al v. Varitalk, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv06622
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker and Eclips, LLC
Defendant:
Varitalk, Inc., Steve Drimmer, Fred Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bush v. Cao et al
as 5:2007cv04460
Plaintiff:
James Alan Bush
Defendant:
Long Cao, Kathy Bickel, Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
