Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Martin v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2012cv02144
Plaintiff:
Collis D. Martin
Defendant:
Charles Martinowski and David Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Landa et al
as 3:2012cv00525
Defendant:
Lee Dove, Lincoln Fay, Luis Landa and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oden v. Cadish et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Defendant:
Elissa Cadish, Family Court, District 8, Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S Oden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Global Verge, Inc. v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2010cv01360
Plaintiff:
Global Verge, Inc. , NV
Defendant:
People Helping People, Inc. and Derrick L. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Wood Rodgers, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00341
Defendant:
The City of Elko, Nevada
Plaintiff:
Wood Rodgers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Trigger et al
as 2:2009cv00843
Plaintiff:
Judith Trigger, Judith Trigger, Judith Trigger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodgers v. Nye County Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
J. Rodgers
Defendant:
Nye County Detention Center, Martinez, Sgt. Rising and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pye v. Pacheco et al
as 2:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Pye
Defendant:
Pacheco, Rodgers, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mohamed v. North Las Vegas Detention Center Correctional Officers et al
as 2:2008cv00421
Plaintiff:
Zazv Mohamed
Defendant:
North Las Vegas Detention Center Correctional Officers, Pacheco, Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
