Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Rodgers v. Mohamed et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
William Rodgers
Defendant:
Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed, Contract Freighters, Inc. and United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Palmer v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Palmer
Defendant:
Rodger Bowers, Justin C. Sands, Johnny W. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell, Jr. v. Simon et al
as 9:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Darra Simon, Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers et al v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Rodgers and Victor H. Baker
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
McLaughlin v. Bowers et al
as 4:2022cv04509
Plaintiff:
Kavan W. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Rodgers Bowers, Margarita Thomas, Diana Duff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv04487
Plaintiff:
Antwan King
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Joel Gauna, Rodger E. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemon v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv04359
Plaintiff:
Darius Lemon
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Joel Gauna, Rodger E. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv03813
Plaintiff:
Julian Silvas
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jason Clark, Rodger Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell, Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 9:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly, Jr., John D. Lackey II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00931
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
