Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Armando Ramos, Albert Ferreira, Cynthia Fountain and others
Defendant:
Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ramos v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Victor L Ramos
Defendant:
Tiffany, John Doe and Randy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Elite Fts.com, LLC
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RAMOS
Defendant:
ELITE FTS.COM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. Integon National Insurance Co
as 3:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Natalia Martin and Edgardo Ramos
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rogers v. Thody et al
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Jason Thody, Joseph Mauro, Kevin Small and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Whirl Pool
as 3:2021cv01437
Plaintiff:
Nestor Ramos
Defendant:
Whirl Pool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
