Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hruby v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Hruby
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marc Hodge, Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. S.A. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allan K Austin
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marc Hodge, Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy et al v. Elyea et al
as 2:2012cv02155
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis and Louis Schicker
Plaintiff:
Andre Kennedy , Timothy Giancana , Paul McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Wilcoxson et al
as 1:2011cv08412
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Michelle L Wilcoxson, Randell Wilcoxson and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Dart et al
as 1:2011cv05915
Plaintiff:
Randell Brown
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez, Superintendent Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Randel et al
as 2:2011cv02110
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel T Jackson
Defendant:
Michael P Randel, Keith O Anglin and John .. Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv07629
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas, John Batiste, Jr., Sean Hanks and others
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez, Sup. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt v. Randell et al
as 3:2010cv00806
Petitioner:
Joseph Bobbitt
Respondent:
Randell, Department of Corrections, Lee Ryker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt v. Randell et al
as 1:2010cv06437
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bobbitt
Defendant:
Randell, Department Of Corrections, Lee Ryker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
