Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Wallway v. John Doe MHP Officer
as 9:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randy Raymond Wallway
Defendant:
John Doe MHP Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentley v. Beeson et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Defendant:
Myron Beeson, Joe Turner and Steve Krammer
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. USA
as 1:2016cv00101
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brogan Yardley Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sundquist et al v. Bjorklund et al
as 4:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gloria S. Sundquist , William Hannah , Sharon Hannah and others
Defendant:
Ashland, CHS, Conoco Phillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. USA
as 6:2013cv00047
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Belanus v. Clark et al
as 6:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Duane Ronald Belanus
Defendant:
Phil Clark, Raymond Potter, Cory Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dauenhauer v. Green Investment Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tom Dauenhauer
Defendant:
Green Investment Group, Inc. , M2Green Redevelopment, LLC , Raymond S. Stillwell and others
Third_party_defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Bridger Three, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
M2Green Redevelopment, LLC
Counter_claimant:
M2Green Redevelopment, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Tom Dauenhauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evert v. Frink
as 9:2012cv00015
Petitioner:
Raymond Earl Evert
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vulk et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Vulk and Linda Vulk
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , St. Peter's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivant v. Spectrum Medical Services et al
as 9:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Kevin Raymond Sullivant
Defendant:
Spectrum Medical Services, Nurse Practitioner Judy, Ravalli County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
