Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-10422
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-10315
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00024
Petitioner:
Raymond Claudio
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-15755
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01507
Petitioner:
Raymond Claudio
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Raymond Claudio
as 14-13128
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Mandamus Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 14-12660
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Raymond Claudio v. Wendy Berger, et al
as 13-15157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDY BERGER, CHERYL STRICKLAND and JANE DOE
CLAUDIO v. KELLY
as 5:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Defendant:
ANGUS KELLY, RANDALL BRYANT, LINDA CAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Berger et al
as 3:2013cv01237
Plaintiff:
Raymond Claudio
Defendant:
Wendy Berger, Cheryl Strickland and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
