Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Kinder v. MAC Manufacturing Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Travis Kinder , James S. Huntsman, Travis L. Kinder and others
Defendant:
MAC Manufacturing Inc. and MAC Trailer Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tucker v. County of Stark et al
as 5:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Brian Tucker
Defendant:
County of Stark, Brian Arnold, Gary Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
David Keith Roach, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Cox et al v. Hocking County Agricultural Society et al
as 2:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox , Danielle Cox , H.C. Minor and others
Defendant:
Hocking County Agricultural Society, George Andrews, Teresa Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2015cv01824
Plaintiff:
Betty J Roach and Carl L Roach
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roach v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01967
Plaintiff:
Mary Roach
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01951
Plaintiff:
Timmy B. Roach and Bonnie J. Roach
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00831
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dawn Roach
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Roach
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach Studios, LLC v. Street Moda, LLC
as 2:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Roach Studios, LLC
Defendant:
Street Moda, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
