Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J et al
as 1:2018cv03807
Defendant:
Sgt. Abiodun Adamolekun, Robin Woolford, Kranich and others
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Neverdon et al
as 8:2018cv03045
Plaintiff:
William K Dixon
Defendant:
Ashraf Mahboob, Robin Woolford, R.S. Roderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Woolford et al
as 8:2017cv03655
Plaintiff:
William K Dixon
Defendant:
Robin Woolford, Deborah Corcoran, Frank B. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant-EL v. Corcoran et al.
as 1:2017cv03402
Plaintiff:
Cortney Bryant-EL
Defendant:
Dayeen M. Corcoran, Robin Woolford, Audrey Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv03063
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Brooks
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Jeff Nines, William S. Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dicks v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02554
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Dicks
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Jr., Jeff Nines, Jason Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Bruman Stalin Alvarez
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, David Blumberd, Greeg L. Hershberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dontay Carter-El v. Scott S. Oakley
as 16-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTAY CARTER-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BRAD WILT, SCOTT S. OAKLEY, ROBIN WOOLFORD and others
Arthur Rodgers v. Michael Stalling
as 14-7291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR RODGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STALLINGS, LEAH YOUNGBLOOD, SERGEANT WHITACRE and others
Defendant:
OORT
Kevin Short v. Bobby Shearin
as 14-7228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN I. SHORT
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, N.B.C.I., MRS. LEGGE, Mailroom Supervisor, NBCI/WCI, LIEUTENANT WILT, ARP Coordinator, NBCI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
