Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christie v. USA
as 1:2017cv00201
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roger Cusick Christie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Duell v. CIT Bank N.A.
as 1:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darrin Roger Duell
Defendant:
CIT Bank N.A. , Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Doe Defendants 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00585
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Kahuku Senior Citizens Community Association et al v. Kahuku Elderly Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2016cv00557
Defendant:
Kahuku Elderly Partners, L.P, Kahuku Elderly Partners, L.P., Kahuku Elderly Management, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Kahuku Senior Citizens Community Association, Douglas H. Worrall, Anita Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nobriga v. Mooers et al
as 1:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
Frank Kamehameha Nobriga
Defendant:
Gregory Mooers, Greg Chun, Roger Imoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bates v. USA
as 1:2016cv00326
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roger Manu Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Christie v. Shinn
as 1:2013cv00364
Petitioner:
Roger Christie
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
