Cases 21 - 30 of 461
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Buder et al v. The Fire Department of the City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10890
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buder, Ceasar Holloway, Ferdinand Bonifacio and others
Defendant:
The Fire Department of the City of New York and CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hukill v. State of California, et al.
as 24-268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON SCOTT HUKILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEAN LAFFERTY, Judge, JAMES NEAVITT and others
Niquette v. Harris et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Niquette
Defendant:
Taylor C. Harris, Janet D. Widmann, Juliane T. Park and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cutera, Inc.
Speculative Product Design, LLC v. Patel et al
as 1:2023cv04716
Plaintiff:
Speculative Product Design, LLC
Defendant:
Rohan Vishnubhai Patel and RVP1986 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Bock Holdings, LLC, et al v. Republic of Honduras, et al
as 23-13552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOCK HOLDINGS, LLC, CINDY MILLER, GARY MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS and NATIONAL AGRARIAN INSTITUTE OF HONDURAS
O'Neill v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Williams v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Rohan Mangroo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13811
Petitioner:
ROHAN MANGROO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dhruva et al v. CuriosityStream Inc.
as 1:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Rohan Dhruva and Joshua Stern
Defendant:
Curiosity Inc. and CuriosityStream Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
