Cases 21 - 30 of 3,656
Rojas Sr. et al v. Aida Fort Lauderdale, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60759
Defendant:
Aida Fort Lauderdale, LLC doing business as Chala also known as Chala Taqueria, Chala Taqueria, Eduardo P. Gavilan and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Rojas Sr. and Julio Antonio Rojas Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rojas-Osegueda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2871
Petitioner:
KATHERYN MARIBEL ROJAS-OSEGUEDA and JOSE LEONARDO PORTILLO-ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramon Alvarez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Department, The County of Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dalguerri v. GEICO General Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv21684
Plaintiff:
Justina Rojas Dalguerri
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Del Rosario Rojas, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2732
Plaintiff:
EVELYN DEL ROSARIO ROJAS and J. ASUNCION ROJAS BAUTISTA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
ROJAS v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05547
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ANNAMARIE ROJAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amparo et al v. Roldan et al
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Cristiano Amparo and Abel Millares-Rojas
Defendant:
LeRoy Roldan, Ryder Truck Rental LT and United States of America ex rel United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Carmona Rojas v. Garland
as 24-2544
Petitioner:
JUAN CARMONA ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
