Cases 21 - 30 of 140
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
ANDRE R. BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GREEN
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, JUDGE MOSS BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GEDEON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, VERIZON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UMANA-ROMERO v. GREENBERG
as 2:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
KATTIA UMANA-ROMERO
Defendant:
RICHARD GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROMERO et al v. INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROMERO and ERIC WRIGHT
Defendant:
INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, SDi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
